Login   |   Create Login/Upload Kancept

Nike ONE

Nike ONE

A near future vehicle designed with the driver/athelete as the power source. Both physical and mental training is required to achieve its full potential.


Kancept by: Phil Frank

26 comments


Would you buy this?


Top Kancept Rankings

Keep me updated about this website


Comments


(Wed, 23 Aug 2006 00:14:39 GMT) luis says

neat design, but what about a human-electric hybrid? could be a commuter choice if we hit the 140$ target.

(Wed, 23 Aug 2006 00:32:00 GMT) Osman Can Ozcanli says

Its so beautiful I want to print a poster of it and hang it on my wall

(Wed, 23 Aug 2006 00:39:16 GMT) Phil Frank says

If you would like more images and information on the technology and design of the Nike ONE visit the following sites: http://www.gtplanet.net/forum/showthread.php?t=57094 http://www.phil-frank.com

(Wed, 23 Aug 2006 04:16:38 GMT) DaGuti says

Cool

(Wed, 23 Aug 2006 15:30:39 GMT) Rutger says

I am wondering what kind of mental training is required to power this vehicle

(Wed, 23 Aug 2006 22:57:26 GMT) Phil Frank says

Visit www.phil-frank.com for more insight and sketches, middle button, second link down. And a video if you like at http://video.google.com/videosearch?q=Nike+ONE&hl=en

(Wed, 06 Sep 2006 17:23:32 GMT) osman mutlucan says

super

(Fri, 20 Oct 2006 11:49:41 GMT) Syllogism says

a bit of style over substance here. You would need to be Arnold on steriods to get that thing moving. And you'd be super low on the ground... for what? if you gonna be the power source surely you wouldn't be able to get it up to speeds where a low center of gravity would be required. And you eye level would be so low you'd be pratically blind.

(Fri, 20 Oct 2006 18:41:01 GMT) matt says

worse than that - other, larger vehicles will have a hard time seeing you.

(Fri, 20 Oct 2006 20:01:57 GMT) Sand says

If you are near the ground in an open vehicle you will get very dirty very quickly.

(Fri, 20 Oct 2006 22:52:11 GMT) JM says

i'm not sure what part of my body i would be exercising here, do i crank that flip-up top part up and down like a car jack? or is that the mental exercise part of it, trying to figure out how to make the thing move??

(Sat, 21 Oct 2006 02:31:32 GMT) Richard says

Is it like a stairmaster? That would make it very uncomfortable to perform that exercise while attempting to look up to see where you're going. Though, I really like the cool and sexy aerodynamics and the idea of a vehicle that reduces emissions and makes the owner stronger/healthier = everybody wins.

(Sat, 21 Oct 2006 03:26:25 GMT) Sean Q says

Near future aside, I'm not sure if I understand the narrower rear wheel base from a stylistic or conceptual standpoint at all. If anything, wouldn't it present a less aerodynamic profile than if the rear wheels followed the same path as the front wheels? And some turning stability (at higher speeds) is obviously lost at the same time. As far as appearances are concerned, it looks like the car has a massive and powerful front end, but the rear portion has atrophied and is weak, like a bodybuilder who completely forgot about his legs.

(Sun, 22 Oct 2006 11:23:45 GMT) Mich says

Great design BUT you need to have it on electric power. Nobody wonts to see something like that moving at 10km/h. It wont take.

(Sun, 22 Oct 2006 18:33:15 GMT) Juve says

If you can get this thing electric or semi electric (half human power and half electric) to gain speed of up to 65km/hr I would buy it. It would be great on turns because of its shape and the feeling of driving it would be sensational because you are so close to the ground. At 60 it would feel like 150. I think even if you throw in a small scooter engine in there its not bad enough because its not gonna be using much gas. It would fuel... I'd buy it then even if it goes 65km max.

(Mon, 23 Oct 2006 07:52:30 GMT) Huw says

You can drive this concept car in Gran Turismo 4 on PS2.

(Mon, 23 Oct 2006 15:40:36 GMT) Brad Henry says

Reminds me of a vehicle that the guy from SouthPark made... <a href="http://www.seoslap.com">Business Blog Optimization</a>

(Mon, 23 Oct 2006 18:55:29 GMT) sam says

Are you talking about mr. garrison's gyroscope thing. OUCh i hope this one doesn't have any flexi-grip controls. :)

(Wed, 25 Oct 2006 15:48:13 GMT) Julian says

Why on earth would you need a spoiler on something human powered?? I think a bike would have to be faster, how much would that monstrocity weigh?

(Mon, 30 Oct 2006 05:19:57 GMT) Bradford says

if nothing else it does display excellent styling

(Mon, 30 Oct 2006 23:02:45 GMT) timmy hilfiger says

I already have this car in GT4

(Mon, 20 Nov 2006 02:50:15 GMT) Jen says

I dont get it...

(Wed, 06 Dec 2006 04:30:57 GMT) Ongthrook Zul Threep says

Cool. Could I convert my Sinclair C5 ?

(Thu, 21 Dec 2006 01:44:23 GMT) Alex says

Love the hubless wheels. It just needs a Capstone turbine, regenerative braking, and compressed air or electric energy storage. Those wheels could never be human-powered.

(Thu, 17 Sep 2009 14:41:03 GMT) Jay Klampdown says

Completely useless. It's too wide to drive where a bike can go, so you're stuck going maybe down the street and back if you're lucky and a cop doesn't see you. The concept would work much better with narrow tires and forget about the hubless wheels -- they're totally impractical for anything that'd normally have suspension.

(Thu, 16 Sep 2010 19:27:43 GMT) Tryniti Edgewood says

So fun and so cool! If we had smaller cars with these sorts of designs I think traffic could be greatly reduced.



You must log in to post comments

Give us Feedback